| | |  | Leadership 
				Through Tears?(October 3, 2007)
 | 
 | 
 | 	 |  | 
				| In Robert Draper's new book, Dead Certain: The 
				Presidency of George W. Bush, the president admits to crying 
				quite a bit -- mostly in private -- ever aware that the troops, 
				not to mention the enemies of America, are watching him. 
 In the past I heard people, from those on television to some 
				friends, express their disappointment that President Bush 
				doesn't publicly cry, or show grave emotion, when talking about 
				even the saddest of situations. I never believed that to be the 
				case, but let's consider the accusation nonetheless.
 |  | 
					 Doug Powers
 | 
 |  | Bush, like many of us, doesn't wear his 
				emotions on his sleeve, and I think that should be a requirement 
				for a job such as the presidency. 
 Lack of outward emotion is often mistaken as heartlessness or a 
				lack of caring by people who TiVo Oprah daily and think that the 
				problem hasn't been invented that can't be solved by a 'jammy 
				party, group hug and weepy confession.
 
 Whenever I hear that Bush isn't outwardly "consumed by grief and 
				sorrow" in awful situations, a question comes to mind: Is a 
				consistent public display of raw emotion something we really 
				want in our leaders?
 
 Imagine you're on a commercial airline, and every time your 
				flight hits severe turbulence your pilot gets on the intercom 
				and screams like a woman who just saw a mouse in the kitchen. 
				Would it ease your nerves to know that the pilot is "just like 
				us" because he's sharing our emotions?
 
 Some view a crying leader as a weak one, and some view a leader 
				who never cries in public as a cold one. I tend to view a weepy 
				politician much like the female orgasm-it's an emotional human 
				reaction that can also, by the right practitioners, be 
				convincingly faked.
 
 I don't know about you, but I don't want a leader who cries at 
				the drop of a hat. Take some of the greats as examples. What if 
				General Patton had altered one of his famous quotes to satisfy 
				those demanding tears from their leaders? "An army is a team. It 
				eats, sleeps, fights and cries as a team."
 
 How about Sir Winston Churchill? He's remembered as one of the 
				world's great leaders, and he wasn't known to bawl in public, 
				nor chastised for failing to do so, for that matter. And it 
				would have been easier for ol' Winston, since bawling comes 
				naturally when you're jacked on Johnnie Walker Black Label while 
				V1s explode nearby.
 
 What if Churchill would have said, "We shall not fail or falter. 
				We shall not weaken or tire," then choked up and concluded with 
				a weepy, "Clemmie, hand me a Kleenex"?
 What if President Truman's nickname was "Give 'em sobbing, 
				Harry"?
 
 What if Martin Luther King Jr. had said, "I have a dream that my 
				four little children will one day live in a nation where they 
				will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by how much 
				they cry in public"?
 
 What would have happened if Douglas MacArthur said "I shall 
				return, after a good bewailing"? A bunch of Filipinos would have 
				been suddenly a little more insecure, that's what.
 
 What if Reagan had said, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this 
				emotional wall between us"?
 
 There have been leaders who cried, and with mixed results. Who? 
				Well, Bill Clinton got misty a lot and was still politically 
				successful. A TV camera does to Bill Clinton what chopping 
				onions does to the rest of us. Clinton can turn on an emotional 
				dime, vacillating between tears and laughter with such ease that 
				he must have trained himself to do so by simultaneously yanking 
				out nose hairs while watching Three Stooges movies.
 
 Not all politicians, however, can pull off tears and survive.
 
 Back in 1972, it was alleged that Maine Sen. Edmund Muskie wept 
				on the steps of the Union Leader newspaper in Manchester, N.H., 
				while defending his wife, whom that paper editorialized as 
				"emotionally unstable." Word of Muskie's cry ruined his 
				presidential hopes, and, in many cases, put a quick end to the 
				practice of a politician defending his wife.
 
 Crying is a natural and healthy human emotion, but a leader's 
				success shouldn't be judged by how much waterworks they produce 
				in public. Laughter through tears can be a good feeling, but 
				leadership through tears is darn near impossible.
 |  | By Doug PowersCopyright 
				2007
 About Author:Doug Powers is a columnist and author from 
					Michigan. He can be reached via his blog at 
					
					
					DougPowers.com.
 Comment on this article | 
 |