| BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan - Having risen to the height of 
			public interest since the commencement of the Resolute Support 
			Mission in January, the drawdown of U.S. forces in Air Force Central 
			Command has weighed on the minds of many in 2015, but perhaps more 
			heavily on one mind in particular.
 As the man crunching the 
			numbers here, Tech. Sgt. Gregory Green, 455th Expeditionary Force 
			Support Squadron manpower analyst, views the reduced Air Force 
			footprint through a slightly clearer lense than the average 
			interested party.
 
			 
		
			| 
			 U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Gregory Green, 455th Expeditionary Force Support Squadron manpower analyst, analyses spreadsheets Feb. 12, 2015 at Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan. As a one-deep analyst in the only Air Force manpower office in Afghanistan, Green provides personnel retention and reduction recommendations to commanders across the wing. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Whitney Amstutz)
 |  “There are magic numbers,” Green said. “Numbers for how 
					many support personnel should be at BAF as well as how many 
					Airmen should be part of the aviation package. The same can 
					be said for locations like Kandahar and Jalalabad. These 
					numbers are always evolving and it's my responsibility to 
					analyze the unit's needs and make recommendations on the 
					best way to fill these requirements.” 
 To those on 
					the outside looking in, reaching end strength numbers might 
					appear to be simple as elementary subtraction. However, when 
					factors such as safety, security, quality of life and 
					sustainability are added to the equation, the answers are 
					not always cut and dry.
 
 “We are in the process of building the Resolute 
					Support Mission Change Request,” Green said. “It's an 
					intricate progression and it has to be handled with the 
					utmost care and attention to detail. Manpower is most 
					important during a buildup and a drawdown and this is a 
					unique situation in that while we're ending one mission, 
					we're posturing to support another, namely the Train, Advise 
					and Assist mission. We have to ensure we have the right 
					people to facilitate success.”
 
 In order to reduce the 
					number of Airmen flowing into the area of responsibility 
					each rotation, a critical piece of Green's process is 
					immersing himself in various units around base, developing 
					an understanding of how they operate, and finally, making 
					recommendations to the commanders who ultimately make 
					personnel reduction decisions.
 
 “I don't have the 
					authority to decide who stays and who goes,” Green says. 
					“What I can do, however, is get to know an organization so 
					that I have the wherewithal to advise commanders and 
					superintendents on how and where they can best utilize the 
					smallest amount of people. It's challenging to maintain a 
					mission and also send people home. We're all learning to do 
					more with less.”
 
 As those with boots on the ground 
					can easily attest, the military presence in Afghanistan is 
					undoubtedly shrinking. Throughout this historic transition, 
					those in uniform can rest assured that Airmen charged with 
					trimming the right pieces at the right time do so with the 
					finesse such a task requires.
 
 “Predicting what the 
					future of operations will look like here is a difficult 
					thing to do,” Green said. “For this round of cuts, we're 
					doing the best we can for the people and the mission; we'll 
					just keep doing that until we're where we need to be.”
 By U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Whitney AmstutzProvided 
					through DVIDS
 Copyright 2015
 
					
					Comment on this article |