Marine Corps Divesting To Meet The Future Threat
by U.S. Marine Corps Matt Gonzales, Systems Command December
1,
2021
The Marine Corps has begun a multiyear
process of divesting legacy equipment to increase force readiness,
resiliency, mobility and lethality to support the future operating
environment around the globe.
 A U.S. Marine Corps Hercules M88 recovery vehicle disembarks from the 1st Tank Battalion ramp on a tow truck for the last time at Twentynine Palms, California on July 28, 2020. As a part of Force Design 2030, the Hercules M88 recovery vehicles are being divested from the Marine Corps in an effort to accelerate modernization and realign capabilities, units and personnel to higher priority areas. (U.S. Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Justin Evans)
|
In his 2019 planning guidance, Commandant
of the Marine Corps Gen. David Berger stated that the Corps must
invest in the affordable and plentiful at the expense of the
exquisite and few when conceiving the future amphibious portion of
the fleet.
According to Berger, achieving this vision
requires divesting certain equipment, such as tanks and other aging
systems, in order to accelerate modernization efforts and realign
capabilities, units and personnel to higher-priority areas.
“We must first divest of legacy programs in order to generate the
resources needed to invest in future capabilities,” Berger stated in
Force Design 2030.
As the Marine Corps’ acquisition command,
Marine Corps Systems Command plays a critical role in the disposal
of ground capabilities. MCSC senior leaders and other personnel have
begun developing detailed plans divesting specific gear not relevant
for a future naval fight.
“Our commandant believes in the
importance of divesting certain systems to fund the next generation
of weapons,” said Deborah Olson, MCSC’s former program manager for
Engineering Systems. “This will ultimately make us more competitive
against our peer and near-peer threats.”
A Multiyear Effort
MCSC
began large-scale divestment efforts in late 2019 when the Marine
Requirements Oversight Council released a decision memorandum
ordering the divestment of equipment in certain areas around the
globe.
Upon the memo’s issue, divesting legacy capabilities
became a major effort for all stakeholders involved, including MCSC,
Headquarters Marine Corps Installations and Logistics, Combat
Development and Integration, the various Marine Forces, and Marine
Corps Logistics Command.
MCSC’s Logistics Combat Element
Systems portfolio acted diligently and quickly. Olson established a
divestment-focused Integrated Product Team headed by logistic
management specialist Anthony Baltes. The IPT includes a subject
matter expert, an equipment specialist and others as needed.
After hundreds of hours of meetings and coordination efforts,
Olson’s team oversaw the divestment of more than 5,500 pieces of
equipment valued at $494 million in 2020. This gear included
everything from water and fuel systems to floodlights and
countermobility capabilities.
“In the past, as the Marine
Corps was building large, forward-operating bases in Iraq and
Afghanistan, the demand for our gear increased,” Olson said in an
episode of MCSC’s new podcast, “Equipping the Corps.” “But as the
Corps shifted, we saw the drawdown from that. As a result, we began
divesting of equipment because we had too much of it.”
In
2019, MCSC’s Command Element Systems portfolio began similar efforts
with the divestment of the AN/TPS-59—a lightweight radar that
provides long-range surveillance and ground-control intercept
capability in a tactically mobile environment.
Col. Robert
Bailey, the portfolio manager for CES at MCSC, said the Corps
selected AN/TPS-59 for divestment because the system did not align
with the pacing, evolving threat on a potential Indo-Pacific
battlefield.
“Everything we are doing is important, but not
everything can be the top priority,” said Bailey. “It’s a matter of
objectively prioritizing what we are doing while always making sure
we consider first what the Marines are trying to get done
tactically.”
Force redesign efforts will require MCSC to
divest some larger, legacy systems such as the M1150 Assault
Breacher Vehicle and some materiel handling equipment. MCSC has also
begun divesting of units that oversaw the heavier equipment.
MCSC is in the process of divesting the M1A1 Tank, M88A2 Recovery
Vehicle and Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge. The Corps has begun
transferring those systems to the U.S. Army for use in the
modernization of their heavy armor capability.
The Marine
Corps had more than 450 tanks prior to the deactivation of the tank
battalions. To date, MCSC has transferred more than 400 tanks to the
Army. The remaining tanks in the Marine Corps inventory are afloat
globally on Maritime Prepositioning Ships and are scheduled for
transfer to the Army over the next few years.
“Our
relationships with sister services are critical,” said Anton Stubbs,
the assistant portfolio manager for Logistics with MCSC’s Ground
Combat Element Systems. “Our partnership with the U.S. Army has
expeditiously removed most of the divested heavy armor assets from
Marine Corps inventory, reduced storage and disposal costs for the
Marine Corps, and has enabled the U.S. Army to use divested assets
to modernize their capabilities.”
How Divesting Works
Divesting does not always mean selling or giving away equipment. It
is a complex process involving many moving parts.
The process
requires deep analyses to determine the best disposition path for a
piece of gear, which sometimes requires a set of divestment
instructions. As demonstrated by Olson’s team, MCSC forms IPTs to
oversee these efforts in some instances.
“This isn’t a big
yard sale,” said Olson, who now serves as Joint Project Manager
Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Protection at MCSC.
“There is a lot that goes into divesting equipment, and many
agencies are involved in this process.”
Many divestment
options exist. For example, MCSC might consider returning equipment
to the Primary Inventory Control Activity, a Department of Defense
inventory system, or transferring equipment to international
partners and international organizations through Foreign Military
Sales.
MCSC could also transfer equipment to sister services
such as the Army—a task they have undertaken with tanks, the ABV and
bridging capabilities. This allows the Army to retain and expand its
capabilities at a reduced cost by eliminating the need to buy
additional items.
“It also allows the Corps to cooperate with
sister services and have the capability when required, while
focusing its resources on the next generation capabilities unique to
the Corps,” said Baltes.
The Marine Corps could also send
equipment to Marine Corps Logistics Bases in Barstow, California, or
Albany, Georgia, for repositioning analyses or long-term storage as
needed. MCLB Albany furnishes supplies for Marine Corps forces east
of the Mississippi and forces in the Atlantic Fleet. MCLB Barstow
supports Marine forces west of the Mississippi and the Pacific
Fleet.
MCSC has also used an equipment exchange program
involving collaboration with a company that auctions Marine Corps
equipment in exchange for credit. The command can use the credits to
purchase other items that fit their current needs.
“Divesting
is like a tree you’re trying to work down,” said Olson. “You’re
looking for a divestment path that provides the maximum return for
the DoD and the nation as a whole.”
Olson underscored the
importance personnel plays during the divestment process. She said
the enthusiastic participation of the IPT was key to developing a
sound communication plan for their divestment of thousands of pieces
of gear.
Baltes and Olson participated in many divestment
meetings, working with subject matter experts and other
organizations to determine an appropriate divestment strategy for
equipment. They considered many options for each piece of gear,
weighing the pros and cons.
Ultimately, the team successfully
carried out the mission to support the commandant’s vision. Olson
believes these tasks could not have happened without the dedication,
commitment and professionalism of all parties involved.
“The
Marine Corps is a small organization, so it’s important to have the
right people in place to get the job done,” said Olson. “Having
complete buy-in from our personnel made a complex process a bit
smoother.”
Acquiring New Systems,
Supporting Force Design 2030
Moving forward, the
Marine Corps plans to invest in systems that support Expeditionary
Advanced Base Operations, a concept that involves the employment of
light, mobile capabilities for use in temporary locations in a
maritime environment.
MCSC has begun researching, developing and acquiring cutting-edge
equipment that supports the EABO concept, including modernized
infantry weapons and communication gear. These capabilities include
tactical tablets to increase battlefield awareness, next-generation
water and fuel systems, intelligence capabilities, fires systems,
personal protective equipment and more.
“Fielding these new,
innovative capabilities will support present and long-term goals
that ultimately prepare Marines for combat against an evolving
threat at a moment’s notice,” said Bailey.
Divesting to
support Force Design 2030 allows MCSC to remove aging capabilities
or those that do not directly fulfill the commandant’s vision. It
also gives the command the opportunity to communicate with Fleet
Marines and inform them that newer equipment may be on the way.
“It is important to have a line of communication with the
fleet,” said Olson. “It can be an emotional event for them to lose
certain pieces of gear. But it also allows us to demonstrate to them
that something else is coming.”
These incoming capabilities
will be developed by a team of program analysts, engineers and
subject matter experts with a bevy of experiences researching,
acquiring and fielding cutting-edge technologies for Marine
employment.
The Marine Corps will leverage the expertise of
its personnel as the service undergoes large-scale changes to its
capabilities. However, Bailey says MCSC’s objective remains
consistent: Equip the warfighter with lethal, lifesaving gear.
“Our team of experts work around the clock to support the
warfighter,” said Bailey. “Everybody understands the importance of
the commandant’s vision and supporting the future Marine. We are
working tirelessly to ensure that the Marine Corps remains a capable
naval expeditionary force well into the future.”
The U.S. Marines |
Marines - The Few, The Proud |
Our Valiant Troops |
I Am The One |
Veterans |
Citizens Like Us
U.S. Marines Gifts |
U.S. Marine Corps |
U.S.
Department of Defense
|
|